Pottery Tales in Victorian Painting and Literature
I had the pleasure of attending the Robert and Marian Cumming
Lecture on Monday at the Gardiner Museum in Toronto. The lecture, by Dr. Rachel
Gotlieb focused on pottery in Victorian art and literature and it was an interesting and engaging event that was very well attended (a full house). I had a few colleagues who could not make it to the
lecture, as it was a wet dark cold evening, so I decided to write a small
review post about the lecture, highlighting the main points of the talk.
Dr. Gotlieb
is in the process of writing a book on ceramics in the Victorian era in terms
of metaphors and meanings and I very much look forward to reading it when it is
published. Her lecture focused on how ceramics function as a mode of codifying
experience in the Victorian era. She started with, William
Nicholson’s The Hundred Jugs (1916) ,which was a good way to segue into a
discussion on the form and function of jugs. The discussion turned to the
relation of cracked jugs and fallen women and also how these jugs are described
in the narration of Victorian novels like George Eliot’s Adam Bede. Dr. Gotlieb highlighted Edward
Corbould’s Hetty Sorrel and Capitain Donnithorne (1861) as a visual
representation of a focus on jugs and jug breaking in Adam Bede. In these art pieces there is an emphasis on intact jugs representing
wholesomeness, where the opposite (cracks or chips) represent lack of virtue..
The detail
present in the art, especially in pieces like Lilly Martin
Spencer’s Kiss Me and You’ll Kiss the Lasses (1856) is elaborate, such as basket-shaped earrings. A tulip and sunflower jug is the focus in Spencer’s piece and this is
a common jug seen in many Victorian paintings said Dr. Gotlieb. Another interesting piece discussed is George
Elgar Hick’s Woman’s Mission: Comfort of Old Age (1862) which highlights
English china and it’s relation to the dutiful daughter as well as a connection
to taking care within/of the empire.
One of my
favourite moments of the lecture was when Dr. Gotlieb highlighted the work of George Eliot, Thomas Hardy, Charlotte Brontë, and Anthony Trollope as having many jugs within the
narration that symbolize love and hope but also cracks and shattered jugs as being indicative of larger instances of lack of virtue.
Seeing passages on the screen from novels that I have read many times and yet I did not
notice the prevalence of the jugs in the texts as I was reading them at the time was a great reflective moment. I started thinking about how our own research interests tend to obscure our ability to see other
symbolic aspects (i.e. I can tell you a whole bunch about hands and tactility in
Eliot, Hardy, and Brontë, not so much about plates or jugs) and it had me thinking about what else I had missed.
There is also polyvalent symbolism of ceramics in a single piece of art. For example, James
Collinson’s Answering the Emigrant’s Letter (1850) has at least 10
different types of ceramics present which position the family in the painting not
only in terms of class and employment, but also historically in a moment. Collinson
also continues this theme of ceramics as historically codifying in Home
Again (1856) where the broken egg shells on a plate are symbolic of the
soldier who has just returned from the Crimean War.
However, not
all uses of ceramics are as heavily symbolic. For example, in Frederick
George Cotman’s One of the Family (1880) the ceramics, specifically the
brown jug, are used to draw the eye into the painting says Dr. Gotlieb. The
other highlight of the lecture for me was the reference to the work of the
Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, specifically Burne-Jones, Rossetti, and Holman Hunt and their
use of ceramics. Ending with Holman Hunt’s Honest Labour has a Comely Face
(1861), Dr. Gotlieb’s lecture left the audience with a lot to think about and left me with many avenues to explore in my own research
as well as a desire to look for the presence of more ceramics in Victorian
literature and art as they relate to the sensory.
Comments
Post a Comment