Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

Pedagogical Engagement Myths

This week's blog, the third in a series about embodiment, the senses, and accessible pedagogy, is going to focus on engagement and the many myths that are connected to engagement that assume a certain kind of embodied existence for the learner. To start I would like you to take a moment and reflect on what engagement looks like for you? I use the word look specifically here because so much discourse about engagement is connected to the visual which as we discussed last week gives a sort of primacy to the looking in eduspace that is exclusionary. So what does engagement look like? Does it look differently depending on if you are facilitating a learning space that is on-campus compared to on Zoom or Teams? Okay second question, and the better question: what does engagement feel like?  In order to get away from the many myths that exist in pedagogical space about engagement I think the first thing we need to do is move away from look towards feel. That way we are not only focusing on ...

Latest Posts

Countering the Primacy of the Visual in Pedagogy

Disability, Embodiment, and Pedagogy

Embodied Learning and Words

STLHE 2026

What Organizing Taught Me About Pedagogy

What the Algorithm Misses

Holistic Accessibility and Inclusion

Advocacy In HigherEd

Returning to Academic Roots

Between Growth and Fixed