(Ms)Titled, Or How I Can’t Stop Worrying at How I’m Being Referenced
Academia is one of those strange social spaces where titles
are important. How you define yourself
often takes a back-burner to how others want to define you. This is exacerbated
by the engrained belief that where you teach necessarily defines who you are as a person and a scholar, regardless of
your education and background. I had a good laugh yesterday when my best friend
stated: “I’ve never met anyone who uses titles in mail like you do.” It’s true
when I send mail (real tactile mail, you know through the post office) I always
include titles whatever they may be: Dr.
So and So, Ms. Such and Such, Professor La Di Da, etc. My explanation for this
is two-fold: 1. My father used to work for the post office so how to address a
letter was pretty much the second thing I learned after my own name and 2.
Titles sadly are about respect and if someone has earned that title of Dr or
Professor why not use it? How many times have you seen that conversation on
Twitter about whether you should book your flight using Dr. instead of Ms. or
Mr. and if one wants to be responsible for a medical emergency on a plane. It is important to note that I
am always very aware of how people would like to be addressed and I only use
titles that they themselves have used previously. Titles bring about very complex class and
gender issues to be sure, issues that academics should be engaging with. So
what happens when we mistitle our own?
I have a colleague whom I work with on a regular
basis who is a professor at a local university. She has her doctorate and I always make
sure to call her Dr or Professor when speaking of her to potential students or
others. She on the other hand insists on calling me Ms. both in correspondence
and when speaking to potential students. I have my doctorate, so why am I Ms.
and she gets to be Dr.? When I am teaching I do not get stuck up on titles,
students don’t have to call me Dr so and so, or Professor etc. If they want to call me by my first name I am
okay with this (again I have blogged about this previously here). I do this because it is so very important for me to
create an open comfortable space in my classes, and if titles get in the way of
doing this then I would much rather they discard them. My situation with my colleague is different
however. We call each other by our first names of course when we meet, but it’s
the disconnect between how she refers to me and how I refer to her that is
troubling.
I have politely corrected her on many occasions; my email signature
even has the Dr on it, yet nothing. The
only explanation I can discover to this has to go back to how where you teach
somehow dictates the assumptions one has about you as a scholar. In the past
there were little to no doctoral graduates who taught at the collegiate level
in Canada. Over the past ten years that number has grown to where you are just
as likely to find a Dr So and So at a college as you are at a university. Yet,
old habits die hard. Like the tendency to still call colleges “community
colleges” (a connotative term which I have blogged about previously that somehow suggests
a lesser value education). To me being called Ms. when I have the same academic
credentials as that other person is disrespectful not only to my hard -earned
doctorate but also to the college I work for. I am sure I am not the only one who has
encountered this in their workplace, at conferences, in correspondence. What do you do if you’ve been Ms(titled)? Do
titles matter to you in your pedagogical practice?
Comments
Post a Comment